myths vs. facts
Have concerns about putting a dollar value on a living market?
Myth 1: “Putting a dollar value on whales ignores their intrinsic worth.” Fact: Valuing whale services does not replace or diminish their cultural, spiritual, or intrinsic importance. It adds an economic lens that speaks the language of markets and policymakers, the systems most responsible for environmental decline. By highlighting whales’ role in carbon sequestration, fisheries health, and ecosystem stability, we strengthen protection where intrinsic arguments alone have fallen short.
Myth 2: “Nature-based markets only support Wall Street.” Fact: These markets direct capital to the people and places protecting ecosystems. While investors may participate, the true beneficiaries are local and Indigenous stewards, conservation scientists, and community partners who safeguard biodiversity. It’s a living market, rewarding those who work on the ground to keep ecosystems thriving.
Myth 3: “Nature markets just let polluters keep polluting.” Fact: Nature markets don’t excuse pollution; they make polluters pay for the real cost of keeping nature alive. Today, destruction is cheap because ecosystems are undervalued. By pricing their services, companies must invest in conservation and restoration, creating a market signal that funds long-term ecological health.
Myth 4: “You have to cut down or sell nature to create value.” Fact: Nature is worth the most when it is alive and thriving. Forests, whales, and seagrass capture more carbon and sustain more biodiversity when left intact. Our model ensures communities retain ownership of their assets, and markets are also rewarded for supporting healthy natural assets. The destruction of nature continues with or without nature-based solutions. Through our work, we give nature a fighting chance with reciprocity as the key.
Myth 5: “Nature markets are too complex for the public to understand.” Fact: While valuations use advanced science and models, the concept is simple: healthy ecosystems provide services we all rely on, clean air, water, food, and climate stability. We break down complexity into accessible education so everyone, from students to policymakers, can see why the time is now.
Myth 6: “Nature-based solutions are just greenwashing.” Fact: High-integrity projects undergo rigorous monitoring and third-party verification. Satellites, drones, eDNA, and blockchain-ledger tracking ensure transparency and accountability. Greenwashing happens when corners are cut, +Nature funds the science-based valuations to prevent it.
Myth 7: “These solutions won’t scale fast enough to matter.” Fact: Nature is already the most powerful carbon removal technology on Earth. With proper valuation and investment, markets can scale rapidly, restoring millions of acres of land and ocean while financing conservation far beyond what philanthropy alone can achieve.
Myth 8: “This is just charity — markets won’t invest in nature.” Fact: Markets already rely on nature — for water, soil, raw materials. The issue is that destruction is valued, while preservation is ignored. By establishing credible valuations and forward contracts, conservation becomes financially viable, investable, and scalable.
Published articles that support the Facts.
Whales have measurable ecosystem value
NOAA’s 2024 feature explains how whales store carbon and fertilize ocean food webs, underscoring their climate and fisheries value (economic lens ≠ replacing intrinsic worth). Also see recent research on whales in the carbon cycle. (NOAA Fisheries)Capital can reach local & Indigenous stewards
Coverage of Australia’s Indigenous-led savanna burning shows millions of credits issued and significant local income/benefits; a 2025 forum recap highlights emissions cuts and community gains. (Indigenous Carbon Industry Network)Pricing nature makes polluters pay & invest
EU carbon pricing continues to drive corporate investment and emissions cuts; Germany just launched a €6B decarbonisation program with long-term contracts to spur cleaner industry. (Climate Action)Living nature is worth more intact (forests, seagrass, whales)
New 2025 analysis finds protecting at-risk seagrass could avert >$200B in climate damages by preventing massive carbon releases—illustrating high value when ecosystems remain intact. (FIU News)The concept is simple & teachable
NOAA’s public-facing explainers and education initiatives break blue-carbon services into accessible terms for students, communities, and policymakers. (National Ocean Service)High-integrity projects use satellites, eDNA, blockchain, etc.
NatureMetrics (eDNA pioneer) secured $25M in 2025 to scale biodiversity monitoring; market infrastructure is moving to blockchain/next-gen registries via Verra partnerships and platforms. (naturemetrics.com)Scaling is happening with real finance models
Blue Forest’s Forest Resilience Bonds and related deals are mobilizing tens of millions for large-scale restoration; global “Mangrove Breakthrough” efforts are uniting funders and governments to protect/restore at scale. (Forbes)This isn’t charity—markets are investing in nature
Debt-for-nature swaps (Ecuador, Bahamas) and private funds (EIP’s new $401M restoration fund) are channeling institutional capital into conservation with clear, investable revenue models. (Reuters)